|
Welcome to the Dullhouse
By Delia Rimer
Thirteen, 2003
d: Catherine Hardwicke
|
|
The number thirteen has always been considered unlucky.
Between Friday the 13th and the lack of the 13th floor
in select hotels and office buildings it has always
gotten a bad rap. The film debut of writer/director
Catherine Hardwicke and actor/writer Nikki Reed, is
one more thing to add to the list.
The film about troubled teens tries desperately hard
to be deep, moving and shocking, however I found it
to be none of those things. Maybe I'm just a jaded 22
year old but I did not find anything the girls did to
be that surprising. Face piercing, drinking, drugging
and fucking with a pinch of self mutilation and lies,
lies, lies are nothing new to today's generation.
Evan RachelWood gives a solid performance as Tracy,
our hapless protagonist, but I didn't feel for her,
nor her newfound buttbuddy, Evie. (15 year old co-writer
Nikki Reed) We all have felt insecure during our adolescence.
And lord knows junior high sucks balls. Tracy begins
to treat her friends like shit, she suddenly starts
sucking at school all for the approval of these stupid
hos at school. We see her take out her frustration on
everyone, but it blocks us off from how she is really
feeling. She's not just taking shit out on her mother,
she's spreading the misery. We've seen all of this behavior
in our own lives, and it's not too hard to see through
this and genuinely feel for this person, to understand
what they're going through and to want to reach out
and give them a hug. But I just wanted to walk away
from this girl. I felt like I was watching a two hour
long episode of Jenny Jones that's about moms and their
wild daughters. Only these girls did not get sent to
a boot camp, and there were no commercials to help give
us time to fully take in everything we'd seen.
Tracy has this um, how should we say, loose mom, Melanie
(who also happens to be really hot), who is literally
and metaphorically there for her. She's a few nickels
short of a dime bag, but what she lacks in intellect
she makes up for in friendliness. She's a bit out of
it, but she means well and does the best that a dimwitted
slag can do. Melanie makes the mistake that a lot of
mothers make - attempting to be the daughter's friend,
instead of parent. Depending on ones upbringing this
can be seen as inexcusably intrusive or a void-filling
gift. Even if we do not condone Melanie's behavior,
Hardwicke makes it clear that Melanie is trying working
with what she has to make her daughter's life better.
One can argue that by taking Melanie's side there would
be no way for me to feel any pity for Tracy. However,
there are many works where we often begin to feel for
the "bad guy," (i.e. Peter Lorre in Fritz
Lang's M , Sean Penn in Dead Man Walking) and that did
not happen in this film. Perhaps comparing a troubled
self-conscious preteen with a child murderer and rapist/murderer
seems incredibly uneven. However, in M and Dead Man,
we believe it, we end up feeling for the characters
despite the heinous crimes they have committed. Their
words are genuine, and while this does not absolve them,
it does add a dimension to their character. Tracy lies
her way through the entire story: to her family, her
teachers, herself. Why the hell should we believe her?
. .
There are several sociological aspects of the film
that were fascinating, yet seemed to be looked over
by the filmmaker. One could site sexism as Tracy's brother,
Mason, seems to be the most mature and balanced person
in the film; he's more Tracy's parent than sibling.
And while siblings raised in the same household often
have converse demeanors and pressure on girls (although
not necessarily more or less) often differs from boys,
is it really possible that this kid could have gone
through the same shit and come out zestfully clean?
I mean maybe they're working on a sequel where Mason
goes nuts and shoots up his high school, but for us
to only get a limited (and very chaste) view of this
person isn't fair to the audience.
We do get to see the father, a total scumbag workaholic
who interrupts his once-a-decade visit with his daughter
to take a work call (think Zack Morris' dad on Saved
by the Bell). Although the female roles were more challenging,
it is male Mason who is the most accessible. I couldn't
help but remark to my friend Sophie, that perhaps this
film was the reason there weren't a lot of roles written
for women.
Halfway through the film Tracy says, "If everyone
married someone from a different race there would be
no prejudice." Even though this idea is incredibly
flawed and untrue, I felt it's put in as away to redeem
Tracy and her idea of loving and accepting others -e
veryone, as she wants to be accepted. However during
Tracy's skanky behavior she hooks up with several black
and hispanic boys. The only white boy she tries to get
with rejects her advances. Race relations are not only
ignored, but mocked. Tracy's sexual and drug-induced
relationships with minorities are nothing more than
a part of her descent into depravity. Here is this white
girl who comes from a broken family, yet she really
sinks low by becoming "ghetto." There is no
doubt that her rebellion is considered hazardous and
unhealthy, therefore it is impossible to see her urbanization
as something other than dangerous.
Melanie's on-again-off-again cokehead boyfriend, Brady,
is touchingly played by Jeremy Sisto, who most of us
know as Billy on Six Feet Under (a brilliant show that
does not deserve to be mentioned alongside anything
having to do with this film, unless we are talking about
its script's burial place). Brady appears to be the
one of the more sane characters, but I guess compared
to Billy, how could you not appear normal?
The camera work was more obvious than Lara Flynn Boyle's
eating disorder. During on of the fight scenes, the
camera begins to rock side to side, like a ship on rough
waters. Oh my god, there's turmoil in the house? I had
no fucking idea, but thank you so much for clarifying.
The appearance of the film became more and more bleak
as if to represent the view Tracy grows to have on herself
and her life. It's a great effect and it certainly gives
the film another dimension, however there is very little
to that keeps us attached to the film in the first place.
If the characters are unappealing (and not even interestingly
so) and we begin to feel distant from this world we're
supposed to be a part of, there is nothing holding us
in. This does work in the sense that apathy towards
human behavior and emotion and the future exudes from
the screen and wraps us up in a blanket of nonchalant
lethargy. I began not to give a shit, which I'm sure
is how Tracy felt as well.
|
|
Sponsors:



|